Anticipatory Bail Application’s Disposed Date is 08/11/2011

After getting one more surprise I have checked Bombay High Court Website.
It shows Status is Disposed and Disposed Date is 08/November/2011.
Along with COO Tarak Bajpai , 5 others got anticipatory bail (Agrim Zamanat) from Mumbai Highcourt…

Please check this : http://bombayhighcourt.nic.in/data/criminal/2011/ABA89811081111.pdf

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.895 OF 2011

Rais Shaikh  ..            Applicant.
           -versus
The State of Maharashtra  ..           Respondent.
WITH
CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.896 OF 2011
Rajiv Mehrotra  ..            Applicant.
           -versus
The State of Maharashtra  ..           Respondent.
WITH
CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.897 OF 2011
Rahul Shah  ..            Applicant.
           -versus
The State of Maharashtra  ..           Respondent.
WITH
CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.898 OF 2011
Tarak Bajpai ..            Applicant.
           -versus
The State of Maharashtra  ..           Respondent.
WITH
CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.899 OF 2011
Ravi Khanna  ..            Applicant.
           -versus
The State of Maharashtra  ..           Respondent.

WITH
CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.900 OF 2011
Deepankar Sarkar  ..            Applicant.
           -versus
The State of Maharashtra  ..           Respondent.
Mr. Abad Ponda, a/w Ms. jyoti Singh, Mr. Sandeep Karnik, Mr.
S. Sabari, Ms. Shruti Sardesai, i/b  Phoenix Legal, for the
applicants.
Mrs. P. P. Bhosale,   APP for the Respondent State in Appln
Nos.896 and 900 of 2011.
Mrs. V. R. Bhosale,   APP for the Respondent State in Appln NO.
895 of 2011.
Mr. K. V. Saste,   APP for the Respondent State in Appln No.899
of 2011.
Mrs. S.V. Sonawane ,   APP for the Respondent StateinAppln
NO.898 of 2011.
CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J.
DATED:  8th November, 2011

1. These are applications for anticipatory bail by
persons, who apprehend their arrest in Crime No.13 of 2011
registered at Mhasala Police Station.  Learned counsel for the
applicants at the outset states that without prejudice to the
contentions and defences of the applicants, applicants are
ready to deposit with the trial Court, a sum of Rs.18,89,000/-
within a period of one week which has been mentioned by the
learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon, District: Raigad,
an amount defalcated  while rejecting the application for

anticipatory bail.  In fact the amount mentioned in the F.I.R.
was Rs.1,53,000/- which according learned  Additional Public
Prosecutor, has now escalated to Rs.18,89,000/-.  In view of
readiness and willingness of the applicants to deposit the said
sum before the trial Court, there should be no reason to
subject the applicants to custodial interrogation.  In view of
this, applications are allowed.  In the event of applicants'
arrest in crime No.13 of 2011, registered at Mhasala Police
Station, District Raigad, the applicants be released on bail on
their furnishing P.R. bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000/- by each
of them with one or more solvent sureties in the sums
aggregating to Rs.50,000/- by each of them on the following
conditions :-
i) The applicants shall together deposit a sum of Rs.
18,89,000/- with the learned Judicial Magistrate
First Class, Shrivardhan, District: Raigad, within a
period of one week of this order, failing which the
order shall stand revoked without reference to the
Court. On depositing the said amount, the learned
Magistrate shall invest the same in interest
earning scheme in the State Bank of India, till
decision of the trial and shall deal with the same
at the end of the trial as per result of the trial.

ii) The applicants shall make themselves available on
11th November, 2011 at 10.00 a.m. for interrogation by
he Investigating Officer and thereafter as and when
required by the Investigating Officer.

iii) The applicants shall also furnish their mobile
telephone numbers and addresses and other
details to the investigating officer.
iv) The applicants shall not, directly or indirectly
make any inducement, threat or promise to any
person acquainted with the facts of the case so as
to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the
Court or to any police officer;
v) The applicants shall not leave India without the
previous permission of the trial Court.
vi) The order shall remain in force till the trial is over
with the only stipulation that if chargesheeted the
applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial
Court in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble
Supreme Court in case of Siddharam
Satlingappa Mhetre -vs- State of
Maharashtra and ors,  in S.L.P No.7615 of 2009.
vii) All Applications are disposed of.

(R. C. CHAVAN,  J.)